|
From: | Oliver Cole |
Subject: | [Duplicity-talk] Restore single file from incremental, retrieving full |
Date: | Wed, 4 Apr 2018 21:50:56 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
Hi, I'm testing retrieving a single file from a backup in Duplicity (v0.7.17).The backup set consists of 1 full and 1 incremental - and the requested file only exists in the incremental. (This is a test scenario I put together, so I'm certain this is the case).
When I retrieve the single file (with --verbosity debug) I can see it is retrieving the full backup volumes.
Am I misunderstanding the duplicity model, or is my restore command wrong? It seems to me the metadata should know the file only exists in the incremental and just get that?
I've tried specifying `--time` both before the incremental and after it. Is this affected by the timestamps on the files originally, or only their presence for a backup?
duplicity -vd --file-to-restore example.pdf s3://s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/redacted/ restore
Thanks, Oli
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |