emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7285: closed (24.0.50; doc string of insert-dire


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7285: closed (24.0.50; doc string of insert-directory (in ls-lisp.el))
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:56:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:59:40 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7285: 24.0.50; doc string of insert-directory (in 
ls-lisp.el)
has caused the GNU bug report #7285,
regarding 24.0.50; doc string of insert-directory (in ls-lisp.el)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7285: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7285
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.0.50; doc string of insert-directory (in ls-lisp.el) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03:11 -0700
Please list the supported `ls' switches in alphabetical order.
The current order is not useful:
 
 "It does not support all `ls' switches -- those
  that work are: A a c i r S s t u U X g G B C R n and F partly."
 
Further, it is not clear what the scope of "partly" is.
Is it only for `F'?
 
It should say:
 
 "a A B c C F g G i n r R s S t u U X  (F is only partly supported)"
 
Better yet, say what "partly supported" means: what is the partial
support? what does not work for `F'?

 
In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2010-10-25 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4) --no-opt --cflags
-Ic:/imagesupport/include'
 




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#7285: 24.0.50; doc string of insert-directory (in ls-lisp.el) Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:59:40 +0200
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:03:11 -0700
> Cc: 
> 
> Please list the supported `ls' switches in alphabetical order.
> The current order is not useful:

Done.

> Further, it is not clear what the scope of "partly" is.
> Is it only for `F'?

F is fully supported now, so this is not an issue anymore.

Thanks for pointing out this issue.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]