|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8070: closed (cut command) |
Date: | Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:36:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:44:52 +0100 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#8070: cut command has caused the GNU bug report #8070, regarding cut command to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 8070: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8070 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: cut command Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:19:53 -0600 I'm not sure whether this is a bug or not.On Redhat Enterprise Linux, the cut command will accept the following " cut -c0-5 " (Cut ver 5.97)On Fedora it will not accept the 0, it must be " cut -c1-5 " (cut ver 8.5)Although both are functionally the same, they seem to only return 5 charactersThe script it was written in worked without problems from Redhat 7.2 to present RHELI only noticed the problem with fedora 13 and 14.I was able to copy the cut command from RHEL to Fedora 14 and it works fine. What am losingbetween these two versions?Was there a divergence somewhere along the way where cut stopped tolerating thethe 0 base index?ThanksGeorge Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division, EDI Administrator
address@hidden
ph:856.848.9005 Ext 220The Wyanoke Group
http://www.wyanokegroup.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#8070: cut command Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:44:52 +0100 George Gallen wrote: > I'm not sure whether this is a bug or not. > > On Redhat Enterprise Linux, the cut command will accept the following " cut > -c0-5 " (Cut ver 5.97) > On Fedora it will not accept the 0, it must be " cut -c1-5 " (cut ver 8.5) > > Although both are functionally the same, they seem to only return 5 characters > The script it was written in worked without problems from Redhat 7.2 to > present RHEL > I only noticed the problem with fedora 13 and 14. > > I was able to copy the cut command from RHEL to Fedora 14 and it works fine. > What am losing > between these two versions? > > Was there a divergence somewhere along the way where cut stopped tolerating > the > the 0 base index? Right. That change was due to a bug fix. Here's part of coreutils' NEWS file: * Noteworthy changes in release 6.9.91 (2007-12-15) [beta] cut now diagnoses a range starting with zero (e.g., -f 0-2) as invalid; before, it would treat it as if it started with 1 (-f 1-2). "cut -f 2-0" now fails; before, it was equivalent to "cut -f 2-"
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |