[debbugs-tracker] bug#9525: closed (24.0.50; Elisp manual: index most-(posi|nega)tive-fixnum under (max|min))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:20:04 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#9525: 24.0.50; Elisp manual: index 
most-(posi|nega)tive-fixnum under (max|min)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #9525,
regarding 24.0.50; Elisp manual: index most-(posi|nega)tive-fixnum under 
(max|min)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
9525: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9525
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.0.50;	Elisp manual: index most-(posi|nega)tive-fixnum under (max|min)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:51:28 -0700
>
>
>
>
> In the Elisp manual, try to find the variables holding the largest and
> smallest integers.  Unless you happen to know and look for their names,
> you will not find them using `i'.
>  
> Variables `most-positive-fixnum' and `most-negative-fixnum' should be
> indexed not only under their names but also using the terms "maximum"
> and "minimum" in conjunction with "integer" and even just "number".
> Those are the kinds of words that someone will use when trying to find
> such a variable.
>  
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
>  of 2011-09-12 on 3249CTO
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
> configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt'
>  
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#9525: 24.0.50;	Elisp manual: index most-(posi|nega)tive-fixnum under (max|min)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:20:04 +0300
>
>
>
>
> > From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:51:28 -0700
> > 
> > Variables `most-positive-fixnum' and `most-negative-fixnum' should be
> > indexed not only under their names but also using the terms "maximum"
> > and "minimum" in conjunction with "integer" and even just "number".
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
>
> --- End Message ---