emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#18496: closed (24.4.50; RefTeX modes should use fo


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#18496: closed (24.4.50; RefTeX modes should use font-lock-face instead of face)
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:37:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:36:08 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#18496: 24.4.50; RefTeX modes should use font-lock-face 
instead of face
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18496,
regarding 24.4.50; RefTeX modes should use font-lock-face instead of face
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
18496: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18496
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.4.50; RefTeX modes should use font-lock-face instead of face Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:32:37 +0200
The following RefTeX modes should use the font-lock-face text property
instead of face:

- reftex-toc-mode
- reftex-select-label-mode
- reftex-select-bib-mode

Using face directly breaks fontification if special minor modes are
enabled that add extra fontification.

Originally reported for rainbow-delimiters, see
https://github.com/jlr/rainbow-delimiters/issues/31 and
https://github.com/jlr/rainbow-delimiters/pull/38

On a related note, it seems as if these modes should probably inherit
special-mode, shouldn't they?



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#18496: 24.4.50; RefTeX modes should use font-lock-face instead of face Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:36:08 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
Sebastian Wiesner <address@hidden> writes:

> The following RefTeX modes should use the font-lock-face text property
> instead of face:
>
> - reftex-toc-mode
> - reftex-select-label-mode
> - reftex-select-bib-mode
>
> Using face directly breaks fontification if special minor modes are
> enabled that add extra fontification.

Indeed, thanks for the hint.

> On a related note, it seems as if these modes should probably inherit
> special-mode, shouldn't they?

Yes, right.

I've done both in revision 117907.

Thanks,
Tassilo


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]