[debbugs-tracker] bug#18465: closed (X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:57:24 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #18465,
regarding X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
18465: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18465
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:47:59 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> On this machine:
>
> $ cat /etc/redhat-release 
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client release 5.9 (Tikanga)
>
>
> configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
> configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h:     check for missing prerequisite 
> headers?
> configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: see the Autoconf documentation
> configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be 
> Compiled"
> configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: proceeding with the compiler's 
> result
> configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------ ##
> configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to address@hidden ##
> configure: WARNING:     ## ------------------------------------ ##
>
> Not sure what this message is about, is it necessary to dig through to figure 
> out why the autoconf test failed? 
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:57:24 -0700
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1
>
>
>
>
> That message about "present but cannot be compiled" is emitted by old 
> versions of Autoconf; newer ones don't bother.  As this does not appear 
> to be a bug in Emacs I'm taking the liberty of closing the report.
>
>
> --- End Message ---