[debbugs-tracker] bug#19245: closed (Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:00:07 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#19245: Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19245,
regarding Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19245: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19245
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 01 Dec 2014 20:35:58 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30
>
>
>
>
> After I updated our project's embedded libldtl to 2.4.4, several "No 
> such file or directory" compile warnings showed up; see below:
>
>                                                                ^
> mv -f .deps/libltdlc_la-lt_error.Tpo .deps/libltdlc_la-lt_error.Plo
> /bin/bash ../libtool --silent  --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -DLTDLOPEN=libltdlc -DLT_CONFIG_H='<config.h>' 
> -DLTDL -I. -I. -Ilibltdl -I./libltdl -Ilibltdl -I./libltdl/libltdl   -g 
> -O2 -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wbad-function-cast 
> -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wclobbered -Wempty-body -Wignored-qualifiers 
> -Wlogical-op -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-field-initializers 
> -Wmissing-include-dirs -Wmissing-parameter-type -Wmissing-prototypes 
> -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-declaration -Woverride-init -Wpointer-arith 
> -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wsign-compare -Wtype-limits -Wundef 
> -Wuninitialized -Wwrite-strings -MT libltdlc_la-ltdl.lo -MD -MP -MF 
> .deps/libltdlc_la-ltdl.Tpo -c -o libltdlc_la-ltdl.lo `test -f 'ltdl.c' 
> || echo './'`ltdl.c
> cc1: warning: ./libltdl/libltdl: No such file or directory [enabled by 
> default]
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#19245: Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:00:07 +0000
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Michael Wobst <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > Hey Gary (with one 'r') ;-)
> > 
> > I'm glad we finally figured it out. Thanks!
> > 
> > Greets,
> > Michael
> > 
> > Gary V. Vaughan schrieb:
> >> [[put bug-libtool and debbugs back in Cc:]]
> >> 
> >> Hi Michael,
> >> 
> >>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Michael Wobst <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Garry,
> >> 
> >> (Just the one 'r' in my name, please! :-)
> >> 
> >>> well, it's not just a cosmetical change from what I can see in 2.4.4's 
> >>> libltdl/Makefile.am when compared to 2.4.3's libltdl/Makefile.am
> >>> 
> >>> I did a diff -urN to show you what I'm talking about:
> >>> 
> >>> #####################################################################
> >>> --- trunk_2.4.3/libltdl/Makefile.am     2014-12-04 14:11:47.887496698 +0100
> >>> +++ trunk_2.4.4/libltdl/Makefile.am     2014-12-04 14:11:09.087091542 +0100
> >>> @@ -45,8 +45,9 @@
> >>> # -I$(srcdir) is needed for user that built libltdl with a sub-Automake
> >>> # (not as a sub-package!) using 'nostdinc':
> >>> AM_CPPFLAGS           += -DLT_CONFIG_H='<$(LT_CONFIG_H)>' \
> >>> -                         -DLTDL -I. -I$(srcdir) -Ilibltdl \
> >>> -                         -I$(srcdir)/libltdl -I$(srcdir)/libltdl
> >>> +                         -DLTDL -I. -I$(srcdir) \
> >>> +                         -Ilibltdl  -I$(srcdir)/libltdl \
> >>> +                         -Ilibltdl -I$(srcdir)/libltdl/libltdl
> >>> 
> >>> #####################################################################
> >>> 
> >>> Note the last line with the path being '$(srcdir)/libltdl/libltdl'.
> >>> This doesn't appear in previous versions of libtool, but in 2.4.4
> >> 
> >> Ahah!  Agreed, and fixed in master (I'll push as soon as the testsuite
> >> finishes); thanks for persevering with me.  While the change to ltdl.mk was
> >> indeed cosmetic, I didn't account for the fact that during generation of
> >> libltdl/Makefile.am multiple libltdl/libltdl on a single line of the source
> >> file breaks the edit process.
> >> 
> >> Thanks again for your help in tracking down and fixing that bug.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> 
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---