emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#15430: closed (24.3; ido-completing-read is not a


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#15430: closed (24.3; ido-completing-read is not a replacement for completing-read)
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:22:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:21:43 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#15430: 24.3; ido-completing-read is not a replacement 
for completing-read
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15430,
regarding 24.3; ido-completing-read is not a replacement for completing-read
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
15430: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15430
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.3; ido-completing-read is not a replacement for completing-read Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 00:44:54 -0400
Starting from emacs -Q -nw --eval "(setq completing-read-function
#'ido-completing-read)"

Then M-x gives
ido-set-matches: Wrong type argument: listp, [gnus-put-display-table
message-check-news-body-syntax gnus-make-overlay ido-save-history
message-check-element qp-or-base64 message-insert-wide-reply
help-xref-url-regexp ido-word-matching-substring gnus-set-file-modes
...]

I gather from http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/134000 that
ido-completing-read is supposed to be wrapped, but there should at
least be some indication of this in the docstring. It certainly
shouldn't claim to be the "Ido replacement for the built-in
`completing-read'."


In GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit)
 of 2013-08-23 on localhost
Configured using:
 `configure '-C' '--with-x-toolkit=lucid'
 '--without-toolkit-scroll-bars' '--with-gif=no' 'CFLAGS=-O2
 -march=native''



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#15430: 24.3; ido-completing-read is not a replacement for completing-read Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 11:21:43 -0500
I probably shouldn't have read "replacement for" as "perfect
replacement for". The docstrings do explain the different type
requirements, so there is no need to keep this open.

Note: for an actual ido completing-read-function see ido-ubiquitous.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]