[debbugs-tracker] bug#19318: closed (%guix-version is incorrect in the presence of 'guix pull')

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:00:19 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line %guix-version is incorrect in the presence of 'guix pull'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19278,
regarding %guix-version is incorrect in the presence of 'guix pull'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
19278: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19278
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> %guix-version is incorrect in the presence of 'guix pull'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:57:25 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Running ‘guix pull’ doesn’t change (@ (guix config) %guix-version),
> which gives a wrong impression about the version being (‘guix --version’
> will keep showing the same old version number because (guix config) is
> never overridden.)
>
> The solution may be to add a (guix version) module, that will itself be
> overridden by ‘guix pull’.
>
> (Reported by Tsutsukakushi on #guix.)
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> %guix-version is incorrect in the presence of 'guix pull'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:00:19 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
> > Actually it’s another bug: the version reported is static, which is
> > misleading at best.  See <http://bugs.gnu.org/19318>.
>
> I’m happy to report that this bug is finally fixed, in commit
> b006ba50384f9cb517fa881299160adba0aaca9e.  :-)
>
> It should take effect immediately: “guix pull && guix --version” should
> display a version string other than “0.10.0” or similar.
>
> Eventually the version string will include the Git commit id, à la “git
> describe”.
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---