emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#25922: closed (pkgsrc patches: older Darwin suppor


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#25922: closed (pkgsrc patches: older Darwin support)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:31:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:30:32 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#25922: pkgsrc patches: older Darwin support
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25922,
regarding pkgsrc patches: older Darwin support
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
25922: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25922
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: pkgsrc patches: older Darwin support Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:28:16 +0100
Another pkgsrc patch concerns itself with supporting older Darwin
releases, attached. Can you please merge it?
 Thomas

Attachment: patch-libguile_stime.c
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#25922: pkgsrc patches: older Darwin support Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:30:32 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
On Wed 01 Mar 2017 21:28, Thomas Klausner <address@hidden> writes:

> Another pkgsrc patch concerns itself with supporting older Darwin
> releases, attached. Can you please merge it?
>  Thomas
>
> $NetBSD: patch-libguile_stime.c,v 1.1 2016/10/19 14:56:17 adam Exp $
>
> Fix building on Darwin.
>
> --- libguile/stime.c.orig     2016-10-19 07:55:02.000000000 +0000
> +++ libguile/stime.c
> @@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ scm_init_stime()
>    if (clock_gettime (CLOCK_REALTIME, &posix_real_time_base) == 0)
>      get_internal_real_time = get_internal_real_time_posix_timer;
>  
> -#ifdef HAVE_POSIX_CPUTIME
> +#if defined(HAVE_POSIX_CPUTIME) && defined(HAVE_CLOCK_GETCPUCLOCKID)
>    {
>      clockid_t dummy;
>      

I believe this was fixed in 2.1.6, so I think you can drop this one.

Andy


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]