emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#26659: closed (address@hidden: Re: fonts bug in ic


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#26659: closed (address@hidden: Re: fonts bug in icecat?])
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 22:59:01 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 30 Apr 2017 22:58:36 +0000
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26659: address@hidden: Re: fonts bug in icecat?]
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26659,
regarding address@hidden: Re: fonts bug in icecat?]
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
26659: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26659
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: address@hidden: Re: fonts bug in icecat?] Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:18:25 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
----- Forwarded message from ng0 <address@hidden> -----

Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:42:52 +0000
From: ng0 <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: fonts bug in icecat?

ng0 transcribed 0.5K bytes:
> ng0 transcribed 0.3K bytes:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I used to be able to select system installed fonts (I think),
> > such as Noto or Un.
> > 
> > In the Preferences > Fonts > Advanced dialogue this is no longer
> > possible, at least for the two mentioned fonts.
> > 
> > Is this a bug? I found this while using xfce4.
> 
> Okay, I just checked and the fonts are installed but no longer
> appear in other settings aswell, for example OpenBox configuration
> dialogue.

I checked GNOME, awesome, xfce4, OpenBox and all do not find the
fonts. I suppose this is an gtk(?) issue.
-- 
PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/


----- End forwarded message -----



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#26659: address@hidden: Re: fonts bug in icecat?] Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 22:58:36 +0000
I am closing this bugreport as the fonts in Icecat are all visible and 
selectable now.
jp.wikipedia.org has no problems and this page 
http://www.alanwood.net/unicode/unicode_samples.html
used to be 95% unicode "boxes", now it displays 100% correcly (if you exclude 
CJK Unified
Ideographs Extension B, C and some private Area stuff).

Most operating systems have a "post-install" hook which runs fc-cache and other 
things.
I forget about this, to be reminded of things you used to do years ago is good.

Maybe I should just set a user-cronjob with this and forget about it again.
ng0 transcribed 4.4K bytes:
> I have run 'fc-cache -rfv' and now at least the following happened:
> 
> * libreoffice has visible text again
> * xfce4-terminal can select every installed font (but does not display every 
> preview of it correct)
> * icecat is unchanged
> 
> I'm waiting for the profile software update and will look into more effects 
> tomorrow.
> 
> ng0 transcribed 102K bytes:
> > Well it is worse than icecat now that I have removed every WM/DM but Xfce4.
> > 
> > Most applications still display text, but libreoffice can be seen in the 
> > appended screenshot.
> > ng0 transcribed 3.4K bytes:
> > > Chris Marusich transcribed 237K bytes:
> > > > ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > 
> > > > > Here is a visual display of some fonts: https://ptpb.pw/EQfV.png
> > > > >
> > > > > This is either related to icecat changes or to changes with font
> > > > > related packages.
> > > > 
> > > > The same page (presumably http://www.bbc.com/) renders fine for me; no
> > > > boxes, all glyphs appear to be rendered correctly.  In addition, system
> > > > fonts appear to be selectable for me in icecat.  See attached files for
> > > > screenshots.
> > > 
> > > Well this is odd. And you run GuixSD I assume? I wonder where the source 
> > > for
> > > fonts being suddenly AWOL lies.
> > > I remember that they used to work.
> > > 
> > > > I have not run 'guix pull' in the last week or two.  Would you like me
> > > > to tell you anything about my system's configuration that might shed
> > > > light on the issue?  I'm going to update my system later today, so if
> > > > there are any problems (or not), I'll let you know.
> > > 
> > > Yes, that would be useful.
> > > 
> > > > Maxim Cournoyer <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, ng0 <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > >>> >ng0 transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> > > > >>> >> Were you (or someone else) able to reproduce this?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I never got the Japanese fonts working on GuixSD by following our 
> > > > >>> info manual, and this was before those updates.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Can you tell me exactly or roughly what you tried and what errors 
> > > > >> (not specific, in general) you
> > > > >> see in the current functioning system? It would be useful to get a 
> > > > >> clear view on
> > > > >> languages / localization specific issues to improve the system.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't recall seeing any particular errors, I had simply followed
> > > > > section 2.6.3 X11 Fonts [1] and installed the suggested fonts using:
> > > > > "guix package -i font-adobe-source-han-sans:jp".
> > > > >
> > > > > Japanese characters were still displayed as boxes (with unicode? in
> > > > > them) in any software I tried following a system reboot (gnucash,
> > > > > icecat, etc.).
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html
> > > > 
> > > > FWIW, Japanese fonts work for me in all applications I have tried so
> > > > far, which includes Icecat, GNOME terminal, graphical emacs, and Gedit,
> > > > all on GNOME.  I don't recall doing anything that wasn't described in
> > > > the manual.
> > > > 
> > > > If you're interested in troubleshooting it, I'd like to help you get
> > > > Japanese fonts working.  For starters, maybe this information will help:
> > > > 
> > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> > > > $ guix package --list-installed | grep font
> > > > font-gnu-freefont-ttf   20120503        out     
> > > > /gnu/store/4yk3w5yk8rn2cxzw2kq3ih7l515cy32d-font-gnu-freefont-ttf-20120503
> > > > font-inconsolata        0.80    out     
> > > > /gnu/store/pd23zma09d50ssdww2a3v5xjaafxc8pm-font-inconsolata-0.80
> > > > font-liberation 2.00.1  out     
> > > > /gnu/store/2wp4n6nvzhs9i6cj5c760x3s4xk3lhrk-font-liberation-2.00.1
> > > > font-adobe-source-han-sans      1.004   out     
> > > > /gnu/store/44kyy0nlm2jap3z60gh1bq9s4gpkq3mi-font-adobe-source-han-sans-1.004
> > > > font-terminus   4.40    out     
> > > > /gnu/store/l59m8b44dyiydgf6i3ckgwafdxi2zllw-font-terminus-4.40
> > > > font-dejavu     2.37    out     
> > > > /gnu/store/bs8ky224vljlclrv547k4alz7386lawi-font-dejavu-2.37
> > > > gs-fonts        8.11    out     
> > > > /gnu/store/z0as6gp6grsqs4a8knbxkcwbyxriqmgc-gs-fonts-8.11
> > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> > > > 
> > > > I see that I am not using the "jp" output of font-adobe-source-han-sans;
> > > > perhaps you can try again using the "out" output?
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Chris
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > https://pragmatique.xyz
> > > PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
> > 
> > -- 
> > https://pragmatique.xyz
> > PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> https://pragmatique.xyz
> PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
> 
> 
> 

-- 
https://pragmatique.xyz
PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]