emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#25836: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add gspell)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#25836: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add gspell)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:25:01 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2017 16:24:18 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#25836: [PATCH] gnu: Add gspell
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25836,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add gspell
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
25836: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25836
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gspell Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:26:04 +0100
tests are disabled because they fail

I left a pair of attempts I made, commented out

Also, a link to the gspell mailing list where I asked for help

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-gspell.patch
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#25836: [PATCH] gnu: Add gspell Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 16:24:18 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

I just pushed gspell as 411ba511893feca223656122059cb12378b95c91,
finally!  \o/

Thomas Danckaert <address@hidden> skribis:

> Just for reference, for when we solve the dictionary issue:
>
> While experimenting with this package and (unsuccessfully) trying to get
> it to find aspell dictionaries, I also noticed we could add the
> following native inputs:
>
> +       ("docbook-xsl" ,docbook-xsl)
> +       ("gobject-introspection" ,gobject-introspection)
> +       ("gtk-doc" ,gtk-doc)
> +       ("vala" ,vala)
>         ("glib" ,glib "bin")
>         ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
>         ("xmllint" ,libxml2)
>         ("xorg-server" ,xorg-server)))
>
> and the following configure flag to build docs:
>
> +       #:configure-flags '("--enable-gtk-doc")
>
> I'm not really familiar with the gobject system, but I suppose
> generating the bindings is useful? :)

For now we don’t have any users of gspell at all, let alone users of its
Vala bindings, so perhaps we can leave it as is?

Building the docs to a separate “doc” output could be marginally useful,
I think.

WDYT?

Thanks,
Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]