emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#23274: closed (Misleading error message when runni


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#23274: closed (Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:23:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:18 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running 
guix-daemon as unprivileged user
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23274,
regarding Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
23274: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23274
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:37 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
When trying to start the guix-daemon as an unprivileged user, the
following error message is printed:

error: cannot bind to socket `/var/guix/daemon-socket/socket': Address already 
in use

Would it make sense to try to provide a more helpful error message?



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:18 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Hi Martin,

Martin Castillo <address@hidden> skribis:

>> “Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already
>>another daemon running.
>
> This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be 
> changed.
>
> The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an error 
> message that explicitly says, that another daemon is already running. If this 
> was right, op would be right. But this is not the case and it seems like it 
> is wanted the way it is.
>
> So yes, there is no problem in my eyes, too. This can be closed.

OK, I had completely misunderstood, thanks for clarifying.  Closing!

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]