[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:38:22 +0900 (JST)
Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden> writes:
> I've fixed this so that current matrices on all frames sharing a cache
> are invalidated (using the refcount would mean that images were never
> freed if more than 1 frame exists on a display.)
Right, that was just my quick attempt to avoid crashing...
> > 1) What is wierd narrow region at the bottom of the toolbar, separated
> > from the main toolbar by a line?
> This is kind of a consequence of Emacs still being column/line-based.
> Frame and window sizes must be multiples of the frame font's
> width/height. The tool bar is an Emacs window, and the ``separator''
> is actually the partially visible next tool bar line.
It would look a lot better without it...
The odd thing is that the icons seem be vertically centered without
respect to the extra vestigial line, which I wouldn't expect from it
being a partially-displayed extra line (you can easily see this if
you increase the :height of the default face to 360 or something).
If I narrow the window so that the toolbar gets displayed as multiple
lines, all but the last real line get displayed as `normal' height lines
(i.e., that exactly fit the icon height), and the last real line is much
taller, but *still* with the narrow vestigial toolbar-line following.
The toolbar icons on the last toolbar line are centered vertically as if
the vestigial extra line were part of the extra-tall last line...
It's wierd, anyway.
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- toolbars, Miles Bader, 2000/09/17
- Re: toolbars, Gerd Moellmann, 2000/09/18
- Re: toolbars,
Miles Bader <=