[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New names for VC local version backups

From: Kai Großjoha nn
Subject: Re: New names for VC local version backups
Date: 25 Oct 2000 23:39:20 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90

On 25 Oct 2000, Andre Spiegel wrote:

> Hmm, this doesn't appeal to me.  It would result in an explosion of
> subdirectories under `versions'.  It would be difficult to find a
> version of a particular file if you don't happen to know the version
> number.  Completely unrelated files would end up in the same
> subdirectory only because they happen to have the same version
> number.

The obvious alternative is to use versions/foo.c/1.42.  Yet nobody
mentioned it.  Is it bad for some obvious reason, and I'm just failing
to see it?

I like BOTH kinds of music.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]