[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unicode support

From: Dave Love
Subject: Re: Unicode support
Date: 23 Jul 2001 17:56:19 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0

>>>>> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

 WL> What you are talking about is Unicode level 1.  But to properly
 WL> support Indic languages more things have to be done.  Even simple
 WL> combining characters will have to be represented differently,

For info, what needs to be done essentially differently for these
languages compared with existing support in Emacs?

For what it's worth, I did try a trivial proof of concept for Unicode
support (as I understand it) of Thai, based on thai-util.el and
post-read conversion.  As far as I could tell, it treated the level 2
example in Kühn's demo text correctly, but Mule-UCS is the only thing
against which I can compare.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]