[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2001 09:18:59 -0500 |
> Tue, 04 Dec 2001 10:20:49 -0500: "Stefan Monnier"
> <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Take write-file-hooks for example and imagine we redefine it
> > as a wrapper-hook. Now instead of returning non-nil to indicate
> > "I did the save", it can simply not do the recursive call.
> >
> > Or just like around-advices do not have to refer back to ad-do-it
> > which can also prevent other advices from being executed.
>
> OK, I'll leave the convention to the small example in the doc string.
Actually, I agree with Richard that the docstring should make it
clear what is the normal behavior. I only objected to the way
the convention was presented as the only way things could work.
Stefan
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03