[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: lisp/term/vt*.el
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:15:53 +0200 (IST)

Is there any reason why so many of the vt*.el files are exact copy of 
one another (modulo comments)?

If that's because we want users to be able to remove unused *.el and 
*.elc files in lisp/term, then we don't do that consistently: vt100.el 
and lk201.el are required by all the vt*.el files.

Should I make all the derivative vt*.el files just load one master file 
instead of including a copy of it?

(Yes, I know: this is an insignificant issue.  But I'm making changes in 
some of these files, and could do some cleanup while I'm at that.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]