[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings |
|
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:58:23 -0700 (MST) |
It does use GNUTLS, but since GNUTLS is a compile time option, it
cannot be assumed to be available. Hence the addition of ssl.el which
invokes OpenSSL as a fallback if GNUTLS was not compiled with Emacs.
How does it invoke OpenSSL (when it does)? Why can't it invoke
GNUTLS the same way?
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, (continued)
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/04
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, William M. Perry, 2002/02/04
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, William M. Perry, 2002/02/21
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/21
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/22
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/23
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/23
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/24
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/25
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/25
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26