[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX |
Date: |
11 Jul 2002 15:27:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:52:10 -0600 (MDT), Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
> > A better name would be SPECPDL_INDEX.
> >
> > Would someone please make that global replacement?
>
> Done.
For consistency, I suggest to change all occurrences of `specpdl_ptr -
specpdl' to SPECPDL_INDEX.
Also the name of the variable where we store the value
of SPECPDL_INDEX is typically named `count' which I find pretty
confusing reading the code ... "count of what?".
I'd suggest changing the name of those variables to `specpdl_index' or
just `spix' (which isn't currently used anywhere) for short.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/10
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Andreas Schwab, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/12
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/12