Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX

[Stefan Monnier]

> > Could people refrain from making such "gratuitous" pervasive changes ?
> 
> Sorry. I changed BINDING_STACK_SIZE to SPECPDL_INDEX as per Richard's

This is fine.  It's a new macro so it's OK to change it (code that uses
it is still fresh).

> request, and then it seemed logical to change all uses of specpdl_ptr -
> specpdl to SPECPDL_INDEX.

This might be a good change, so I can live with it: it's not gratuitous.
But the count -> index|spix|... switch is just plain silly and will only
make my life worse.


        Stefan