[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Carsten Dominik <address@hidden>] Re: lisp/ChangeLog corruption
From: |
Steve Youngs |
Subject: |
Re: [Carsten Dominik <address@hidden>] Re: lisp/ChangeLog corruption |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 03:01:14 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.5 (broccoli, i686-pc-linux) |
|--==> "RS" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have been using XEmacs 21.1 patch 14 (Mule) to check edit and check
> in the file. I don't know why it would change the coding system, but
> maybe it does. I don't know much about coding systems...
Carsten, this might help (untested):
(if (featurep 'mule)
(progn
(define-coding-system-alias 'iso-2022-7bit-unix 'iso-2022-7bit)
(add-to-list 'file-coding-system-alist '("ChangeLog" .
iso-2022-7bit-unix))))
RS> Please don't do this with XEmacs any more. Please use Emacs.
Why? Providing that the above prevents any future file corruption in
the ChangeLogs, it shouldn't matter should it?
RS> (Besides, the only way you can test your changes in Emacs is to use
RS> Emacs.)
True, but it's not often that you need to test changes to a ChangeLog
file. :-)
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<address@hidden>---|