[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:37:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>
>> What would be another way to achieve the same effect that's now
>> achieved by these variables? Take the example of
>> coding-system-for-write: how would you do it in Scheme?
>
> When coding-system-for-write would have been designed for Scheme, I
> would expect it to hidden behind an abstraction; it would not be a
> variable that you can set. It could be offered as
>
> (with-coding-system-for-write 'foo
> (lambda () ...))
I see. What would with-coding-system-for-write look like? What
would functions look like that want to find out which coding system
to use for writing?
Maybe something can be abstracted so that
(with-variable 'coding-system-for-write 'foo
...statements...)
works for all variables. Of course, you might as well call it `let',
then :-)
kai
--
A large number of young women don't trust men with beards. (BFBS Radio)
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/01
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Kai Großjohann, 2002/08/01
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/02
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Richard Stallman, 2002/08/02
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/02
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Kai Großjohann, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Simon Josefsson, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Sam Steingold, 2002/08/03
- Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/08/04