[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: Strange `file-name-sans-extension' behavior
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:47:00 -0600 (MDT)

    Strictly speaking, it isn't correct even for Windows, as this
    example shows:

            c: + bar -> c:./bar, not c:/bar

I don't understand this example, partly because the two parts
are not labeled as to what they mean.  "c: + bar -> c:./bar"
could be a statement of what something actually does (what something?),
or it could be a statement of what something ought to do.
I can't tell which.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]