[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Sep 2002 08:18:48 +0200 |
On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:59:58 +0300, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ah, sorry, I wasn't aware of that (you didn't show the file created
> by the command, so I was confused).
Uh? In my example, the "for" redirects to test.txt, and the bat file
then "types" the contents of test.txt surrounded by rows of "=" to
differentiate any other posible output from the contents of test.txt.
That's why in the first example (without "if") all output is between the
equal-sign rows: is the contents of the redirected file, while in the
second example (with "if"), first there's unwanted output to the screen
and then test.txt is typed, showing that it does contain just a single
line...
> Does it help to put the redirection at the beginning of the command,
> like below?
I'll try it at home ASAP. Thanks.
> (yes, it's a valid syntax for COMMAND.COM and CMD.EXE).
Live and learn :-)
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/04
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/06
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/18
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/20