[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what?
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: MULE shows gibberish; now what? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 10:30:45 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.1.30 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Ilya Zakharevich <address@hidden> writes:
>> Perhaps, we must introduce a variable, for instance,
>> `unreliable-font-registry-encoding-name-list, use
>> XListFontsWithInfo only to find a font whose
>> registry-encoding matches with this variable.
> OK, if you do this, please put '-cronix-*' fonts there. It is a
> horrible thing what they did.
Then, could you please try the first method I wrote like this:
(setq face-ignored-fonts '("-cronix"))
>> > BTW, I agree that the fontset management could be made simpler (I think
>> > it's not just a question of the doc being dense or incomplete).
>> > Especially in your case, there should be some way to say something like:
>>
>> > (fontset-prefer-font 'cyrillic-iso8859-5 "-etl-fixed-*-iso8859-5")
>>
>> Is that intention different from this?
>>
>> (dolist (fontset (fontest-list))
>> (set-fontset-font fontset 'cyrillic-iso8859-5
>> '("etl-fixed" . "iso8859-5")))
> Would not work if there is no etl-fixed fonts on the site?
In such a case, Emacs tries to find fonts ignoring that
foundry/family spec. So, you must use face-ignored-fonts
as above.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden