[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:37:19 +0200 |
On 21 Oct 2002 12:04:48 +0200, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:
> It all depends on when that will be -- and when we decide to feature
> freeze 21.4 (it has been suggested to do so recently, but I don't
> think we agreed to do that any time soon).
It'd be good to decide some sort of (approximate) timeline, and also to
reach a decision about the numbering scheme (AFAIR, there was much
discussion but no definitive decision, but I can be wrong).
/L/e/k/t/u
- mh-e 6.2 imminent, Bill Wohler, 2002/10/21
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/21
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Bill Wohler, 2002/10/23
- checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24