[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO additions
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: TODO additions |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:58:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50 (ia64-suse-linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
|> |> I think it will be hard to make Autoconf set those symbols. For
|> |> instance, consider the variable ORDINARY_LINK. How would Autoconf
|> |> determine that? It is possible that all modern systems use
|> |> ORDINARY_LINK and we can eliminate the conditional, but otherwise
|> |> I see no substitute for handling it the way we do now.
|>
|> Instead of letting autoconf determine the right [sm]/*.h file, it just
|> defines the respective symbols instead.
|>
|> Autoconf does not determine which *.h files to use.
|> configure decides that based on the configuration name.
Exactly, that's what I meant.
|> I therefore challenge anyone to show a way that Autoconf can determine
|> the proper value for ORDINARY_LINK. I don't think this is easy.
Based on the configuration name?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/01
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/01
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/01
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/05
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/06
- Re: TODO additions, Andreas Schwab, 2002/11/07
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/08
- Re: TODO additions,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/13
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/17
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/11
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/13
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/17
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/18
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/21
- Re: TODO additions, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: TODO additions, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/25