[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cc-vars.el
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: cc-vars.el |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:57:15 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> + 2002-11-14 Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
>> +
>> + * progmodes/cc-vars.el: Don't cc-bytecomp-defun char-table-p.
>> +
>>
>> I think that is the right fix--this cc-bytecomp-defun is a bad kludge.
>> I am thinking that maybe we should get rid of it because it is so
>> risky.
>>
>> I had undone Dave's change in set-buffer-file-coding-system to fix this,
>> but I restored that change today after concluding that cc-bytecomp-defun
>> is the real culprit.
> What's all this about? I haven't intentionally touched anything
> related to cc-mode.
Dave, there's nothing wrong with your change. It just
revealed a bug of cc-bytecomp-defun.
That bug is just fixed by Martin in HEAD as below:
2002-11-16 Martin Stjernholm <address@hidden>
* progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el (cc-bytecomp-defun): Fixed bug that
caused existing function definitions to be overridden by
phonies when the bytecomp environment is restored.
So, I've just undone my change to cc-vars.el. I confirmed
that it is surely fixed now by doing bootstrap.
But, Richard is against cc-bytecomp-defun. He wrote:
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> + 2002-11-14 Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> +
> + * progmodes/cc-vars.el: Don't cc-bytecomp-defun char-table-p.
> +
> I think that is the right fix--this cc-bytecomp-defun is a bad kludge.
> I am thinking that maybe we should get rid of it because it is so
> risky.
> I had undone Dave's change in set-buffer-file-coding-system to fix this,
> but I restored that change today after concluding that cc-bytecomp-defun
> is the real culprit.
Martin, could you discuss this issue with Richard from now
on. I don't have any strong opinion on this issue.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: cc-vars.el,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/18
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Miles Bader, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kim F. Storm, 2002/11/20