[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cc-vars.el
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: cc-vars.el |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:41:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
That code seems to majorly obfuscate `byte-compile-if'; is it really
necessary to do that?
It be nice to structure it so that the amount of intrusion into the `normal'
function was very small, with most of the work being done by helper
function(s); that would make it easier to add this feature to other forms.
Thanks,
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: cc-vars.el, (continued)
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/24
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Martin Stjernholm, 2002/11/19
- Re: cc-vars.el, Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/20
- Re: cc-vars.el, Richard Stallman, 2002/11/21
- Re: cc-vars.el, Dave Love, 2002/11/20
Re: cc-vars.el, Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/18