[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GTK patches part 2
From: |
Jan D. |
Subject: |
Re: GTK patches part 2 |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:33:56 +0100 (MET) |
>
> "Jan D." <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Can you send compilation warnings/errors you are seeing or platform and
> > compiler flags?
>
> Why? You reference fprintf and stderr, so you need <stdio.h>.
> You reference malloc, so you need <stdlib.h>. End of story.
Well, I don't usually add include:s unless needed. For example,
xterm.h includes X11 headers who in turn includes a lot of standard
headers. If what is needed gets included that way, I'm fine with it.
Jan D.
- GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/08
- GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/08
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2,
Jan D. <=
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/11
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eric Gillespie, 2002/12/11
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/12/12
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Jan D., 2002/12/11
- Re: GTK patches part 2, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/11