[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1 |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:56:15 +0200 (IST) |
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Jan D. wrote:
> > + @example
> > + widget_class "GtkWindow.GtkVBox.GtkFixed.GtkVScrollbar" style
> > "my_style"
> > + @end example
> >
> > That line is very long. It might work ok if you use @smallexample
> > instead of @example. Please do that for all the examples in the
> > section; inconsistency looks bad.
> >
> > Can this be written as two lines?
>
> It must be one line in the ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file, so I would like to avoid
> changing it.
Any line in an @example that is longer than about 61 characters will
trigger overfull hbox in TeX. Any line in @smallexample that is longer
than 64 characters will do the same. So it's advisable to break long
lines into two, even if they must be a single line in actual usage. You
can always say in a side note that the line must not be broken.
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/01
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Jan D., 2003/01/01
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/02
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/03
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alex Schroeder, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Raja R Harinath, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Eric Gillespie, 2003/01/04
- Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/04