[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al.
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al. |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jan 2003 20:12:29 -0500 |
> Since the suggested change would only effect narrowed buffers, and only
> to make them act more like a normal non-narrowed buffer, I would think
> that only code that explicitly uses narrowing is potentially a problem
> (under the assumption that a narrowed buffer should usually appear to
> lisp code as if it were a normal buffer containing only the narrowed
> region).
>
> This reasoning is plausible indeed, but I still think that whoever
> changes this should also check the callers one buy one.
Instead of spending this time, I'd rather bet $1000 that Miles's change will
not introduce any new bug: it might make an existing bug show up more
often, but introducing a new bug with his suggested change seems incredibly
unlikely.
Stefan
- question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Miles Bader, 2003/01/23
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/23
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/24
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Miles Bader, 2003/01/24
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/25
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al.,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/27
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Miles Bader, 2003/01/27
- Re: question about narrowed behavior of next-property-change et al., Richard Stallman, 2003/01/28