[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:31:45 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, "Edward O'Connor" <address@hidden> writes:
> [1 <text/plain (7bit)>]
> Since no one seemed to object and it's a trivial change, here's a
> patch to add ?\_ support. Light testing here shows no ill effects.
I object to it.
By grepping, I found many files under lisp subdir are using
"?\_" for representing "?_" (e.g. calc/calc-ext.el). Some
are using ?\X unconditionaly even in the place where ?X
works.
That means there are much more such files not included in
Emacs distribution. If we change the meaning of ?\_, all of
them stop working.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- ?\_ patch, Edward O'Connor, 2003/02/05
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/05
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/06
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/06