[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rationale for split-string?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Rationale for split-string? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:39:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:19:31PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> mb> I think Stephen's formulation is very natural, in that you
> mb> usually want OMIT-NULLS to be t if you're splitting on a
> mb> non-whitespace string.
>
> Miles, here you meant OMIT-NULLS to be nil, right?
Yeah.
-Miles
--
I'd rather be consing.
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, (continued)
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Miles Bader, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/21
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Jerry James, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/22
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/23
- Re: Rationale for split-string?, Richard Stallman, 2003/04/24