[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:37:46 +0200 |
> From: David Abrahams <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:17:02 -0400
>
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >>>>>> "David" == David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > David> Now that I've got your attention, I should qualify that.
> > David> On Windows XP using GNUs and talking to an IMAP server,
> > David> it's way faster to use XEmacs than to use Gnu Emacs.
> >
> > Which version of XEmacs?
>
> The very latest I could download a few days ago.
Was that a Cygwin build or a native Windows build?
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Ben Wing, 2003/04/25