Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?

[Jan D.]

> "Robert J. Chassell" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > address@hidden (David Kastrup) wrote:
> >
> >    I was giving an example for a user interface.  What Emacs has 
> > nowadays
> >    does not really deserve that name.
> >
> > But that particular kind of user interface is not the only kind that
> > exists.  Emacs provides two excellent user interfaces.
>
> No.  It provides an interface to the functionality, but "user
> interface" implies something more than just the capability to manually
> edit some configuration files.  Even if the format of the
> configuration files can be found in "user documentation".

Do you mean "Graphical user interface" when you are saying "user 
interface"?
If so, what you say makes some sense.


        Jan D.