Re: [Fwd: [arch-users] Re: Gud lord!]

[Robert Anderson]

On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 08:54, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > [3]  which _does_ offer a CVS->SVN conversion tool....
> > Such notions of "archive conversion" are deeply ill-conceived, IMO.  I
> > see no compelling reason to "fake" development history and many reasons
> > not to.
> 
> Remember the original post your responded to ?
> The one where I complained that the problem with moving files
> in CVS is that getting the past history becomes painful ?

Of course.  What about it?  If you think "archive conversion" is a
solution to that problem in any sense, I'd be interesting in hearing how
you think so.

Bob