[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: [arch-users] Re: Gud lord!]

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [arch-users] Re: Gud lord!]
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 08:59:29 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:14:44AM +0200, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> Yeah, but you know what? What I like more from subversion is that it
> isn't radical, it "doesn't go far enough". It is (or tries to be) just
> "a better CVS". A better CVS is fine by me.

Well actually even though I don't think it's the time to switch, arch seems
pretty cool, and when it _does_ come time to change someday, I think it's a
real contender.  Arch has an appealingly tool-oriented approach, and uses
`understandable' data representations, unlike subversion which seems to be
more of a `big binary blob' design...

I did find an interesting thread on arch on the OpenBSD mailing list, BTW,
where Tom Lord does a pretty good job of answering some skeptical questions;
a google search should turn it up...

The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
  --Albert Einstein

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]