[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (elisp)Numbers
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: (elisp)Numbers |
|
Date: |
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:57:34 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:36:20 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>
>
> What do we do with (elisp)Numbers now that integers have 29 bits? (On
> most machines.) Should all examples in (elisp)Numbers be rewritten
> for 29 bits or not?
Yes, I think so.
- (elisp)Numbers, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/04
- Re: (elisp)Numbers,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- (elisp)Numbers, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/20
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/22
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2003/10/22
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/22
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/23
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Andreas Schwab, 2003/10/24
- Re: (elisp)Numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/24