[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change of C indentation style ('{')
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Change of C indentation style ('{') |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:41:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:28:42PM +0100, Martin Stjernholm wrote:
> I don't think that would be necessary. As I said in another branch of
> this thread, these macro constructs are only truly ambiguous with old
> K&R style function definitions. So it ought to be possible to solve
> with more careful checks.
What about the example I gave (in another message) that would seem to
indicate otherwise?
[Not that I think requring `declarations' of macros is a very workable idea
-- people wouldn't do it 99% of the time]
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), (continued)
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/24
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/25
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/27
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/27
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/28
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'),
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Martin Stjernholm, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Miles Bader, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/29
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/30
- Re: Change of C indentation style ('{'), Richard Stallman, 2003/10/30