[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms |
|
Date: |
09 Feb 2004 08:03:15 +0200 |
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:52:36 -0800
>
> We don't really need both `ncolors>=' and `ncolors<=', `ncolors>=' (or
> whatever we decide to call it) is enough.
Perhaps that's true, but implementing both is trivial, and there
could be some situations where we might want that.
- supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/07
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/12
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/14
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/17
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/08
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Richard Stallman, 2004/02/09