[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 12:42:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Jari Aalto+mail.emacs) writes:
> The "de facto" situation for long has been that everybody
> maps M-g to goto-line. People advice that in newsgroups,
> because it is indeed the most logical key.
Seconded. If no other binding can be found, we can override it in
enriched text mode with a local binding, but as a global binding,
goto-line is certainly much more generally useful.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2004/03/25
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/26
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Jari Aalto+mail.emacs, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27