[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line |
Date: |
27 Mar 2004 12:00:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I want Emacs to move in the direction of doing word processing.
> > It may take years, but we will get there. Then commands to
> > specify faces will become important, and will need a good key
> > binding.
> >
> > I chose the M-g binding for that reason, and the reason continues
> > to have force. So I don't intend to change that binding.
>
> What if users prefer M-g to run goto-line?
They are free to rebind it on their own. That's not a concern.
A concern however is that M-g _is_ frequently rebound by users and
installations to goto-line, and so maybe we should spend some thought
about a recommendation where the font selection commands should go on
installations that rebind M-g, to avoid more inconsistency in actual
installations than can be avoided.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, (continued)
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Joachim Nilsson, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2004/03/28
- Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/03/28