[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:53:42 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 19:33:15 +0300
>
> There are many other Info manuals that have a string `*Note:'
> which is treated incorrectly by Info readers.
What manuals are those?
> What do you think
> about interpreting a `*Note' as an Info reference only if it
> has whitespace around it, i.e. if it matches the following regexp?
>
> [ \t\n]+\*[Nn]ote[ \t\n]+
I don't think it is wise for us to make changes in the de-facto format
of Info files. The current format clearly doesn't require any
whitespace, so you are suggesting an incompatible change.
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/01
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/01
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Karl Berry, 2004/04/01
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/01
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Karl Berry, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/02
- Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions, Karl Berry, 2004/04/02