[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:55:42 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> NEWS is currently +12000 lines.
>
> Maybe we should move the +4000 lines related to 20.x to ONEWS.
I must say that having news for old releases in one file is very
inconvenient. For example, isearching it for some newest feature,
the user can't see if the string that isearch displays is in the
latest version or in one of older versions!
Ideally, NEWS should have a version number in its extension:
NEWS.20.1
NEWS.20.2
NEWS.20.3
NEWS.20.4
NEWS.20.5
NEWS.20.6
NEWS.20.7
NEWS.21.1
NEWS.21.2
NEWS.21.3
NEWS.21.4
If having too many files is undesirable, then files for only _major_
releases could be created, with the NEWS file containing news for the
latest _minor_ release:
NEWS -- news for 21.4
NEWS.21 -- news for 21.1, 21.2, 21.3
NEWS.20 -- news for all 20.*
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/15
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, David Kastrup, 2004/04/15
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/17
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/18
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/17
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/04/17