[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ? |
Date: |
23 Apr 2004 01:38:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
> Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
> > C-M-u (in programming modes) doesn't set the mark, and this is (for me at
> > any rate) correct. I don't want my mark stack flooded out with
> > uninteresting places, typically 20 or 10 or fewer lines apart.
> >
> > On the other hand, I've often wondered whether C-M-a ought to set the
> > mark. I often do a C-u C-<space> first. Maybe I should try advising
> > C-M-[ae] to set the mark.
>
> Setting the mark by C-M-a is very useful when the user uses it to jump
> to the function's beginning to see its arguments and wants to return
> back to the original place. However, the mark shouldn't be set when
> the user uses C-M-a to move the point between defuns.
So it should only set the mark if the previous command was not C-M-a.
>
> > I don't use Outline mode much (in fact only for reading NEWS). Is C-c
> > C-u more like C-M-u or more like C-M-a? Maybe `beginning-of-defun'
> > should jump to the highest level enclosing heading in outline mode, and
> > maybe it should set the mark, too. It would be trivial to code, since
> > there's a hook already there specially for this purpose
> > (`beginning-of-defun-function').
>
> The highest level can be reached by giving a sufficiently large
> argument to the `outline-up-heading' function.
C-u C-c C-u ?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, (continued)
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/17
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/04/17
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/18
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/04/19
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/04/19
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/21
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/25
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/25
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/26
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/26
- Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/26
- isearch (was: Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?), Juri Linkov, 2004/04/21
- Re: isearch (was: Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?), Richard Stallman, 2004/04/23
- Re: isearch (was: Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?), Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/23
- RE: isearch (was: Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?), Drew Adams, 2004/04/23
Re: Should we move 20.x related stuff out of NEWS ?, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/16