[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IELM prompt
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: IELM prompt |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:05:36 +0200 |
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:35:45 -0500 (CDT), Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> wrote:
> The behavior _before_ your patch did not make sense either.
Sure. In fact, for an interrupted process the point ended at the start
of the header :)
> I believe that if one switches back to an active ielm process, point
> should stay where it is.
Yes, it sound logical. I didn't think of it because my pattern of usage
of ielm is very different. In fact, I have a wrapper function for ielm
which shows the ielm buffer in a small window at the bottom of the frame,
and takes it out of view when not using it (that's how I found the
problem with `where-is-internal': I bind a global key to "enter" into
the ielm buffer/window, and the same key in the local ielm map to hide
the window and go back to where I was).
> I could commit if there are no objections.
Not mine.
Thanks,
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: IELM prompt, (continued)
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/22
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/22
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/23
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/23
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/24
- Re: IELM prompt, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/04/25
- Re: IELM prompt, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/04/25
- Re: IELM prompt,
Juanma Barranquero <=
Re: IELM prompt, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/24