[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Several suggestions for image support
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Several suggestions for image support |
Date: |
27 Apr 2004 00:50:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> I have just installed changes to revert to the 21.3 functionality for
> newline height calculation, that is, use the current face font height
> (by default).
Is that really the 21.3 default? I am asking because I was of the
impression that the line arrangement usually was fixed to the
ascent/descent values of the default face, rather than the current
face: namely that merely switching to a smaller font would not
decrease the distance of lines unless you changed the frame's
_default_ face.
Or do we have different values for "height of newline" and "total
height of line"? If so, how are they related?
> Then I added a new line-height property on the newline with the
> following values:
>
> nil -> use height of current face (the default)
> t -> use default face height (as minimum height)
> 0 -> use (don't increase) actual line height
> N (integer > 0) -> use N pixels (as minimum height)
> F (float > 0.0) -> use F * current face font height
Is 0 a special case of N (use 0 pixels as minimum height)? If so,
would it be the same as 0.0, too?
>From your pointing out the different cases, it would appear that they
differ. I am trying to get a feel of things.
> The line-spacing property now just specifies additional line-spacing
> like the line-spacing variable and frame parameter.
All in all, this behavior sounds much more consistent and free from
unexpected sideeffects than the previous implementation.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, (continued)
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/24
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/24
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/24
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/24
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Miles Bader, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/28