[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch |
Date: |
10 May 2004 09:42:16 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> * In a face property, a list of faces is interpreted so that earlier
> faces in
> the list _override_ later faces in the list.
>
> * In an face-inheritance list, _later_ faces override earlier faces.
>
> The order should be reversed for face-inheritance. The face that
> comes first should always override those that come after.
Ok; that's a slight incompability, so it should have a NEWS entry,
right?
BTW, I think perhaps the name `face-override-alist' is a better
(clearer) name than `face-remapping-alist', especially if it essentially
supports the same syntax as a face property. What do you think?
-Miles
--
`Suppose Korea goes to the World Cup final against Japan and wins,' Moon said.
`All the past could be forgiven.' [NYT]
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, (continued)
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/11
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/24
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/24